i write because the the alternative forms of my obsessive insanity are either too destructive or decidedly less sexy.
relationshipstructures
Kitchen table poly is exposure therapy for possessiveness. You can't avoid seeing your partner with their other partner. You're going to be at the same brunch. This is polyamory's version of chosen family—everyone in the polycule knows each other, shares meals, celebrates holidays
relationshipstructures
Every polycule has a single point of failure. The question is whether you know where it is. A polycule is the network of people connected through polyamorous relationships—"poly" plus "molecule." And like actual molecules, polycules have structure: bonds, nodes, and stress points that determine whether
relationshipstructures
Poly is not more fun. It's more work. One relationship is a part-time job. Two is full-time. Three is management-level coordination with calendar software and processing conversations that could fill a therapy practice. The people who do poly don't do it because it's easy.
relationshipstructures
For some people, authority creates freedom. This sounds backwards until you meet the anxious submissive whose nervous system finally calmed down when someone else took responsibility for the decisions. Or the dominant who found purpose in being accountable for another person's wellbeing. For some couples, power exchange isn&
relationshipstructures
Anxiously attached men who live in terror of not being enough have found a strange solution: they've made "not enough" the fantasy. The wife has sex with another man. The husband knows—same as hotwifing. But in cuckolding, his inadequacy is central to the erotic charge.
relationshipstructures
The hotwife dynamic is what happens when a woman's sexual freedom becomes the center of a couple's erotic life—and her husband wants to watch. It's related to cuckolding but not the same. It's related to swinging but not the same. It&
relationshipstructures
Swinging is the oldest organized form of consensual non-monogamy in modern America, and it survives because it solves a specific problem: sexual variety without relationship complexity. The premise is simple. The couple is the unit. Outside sex is recreational—like playing tennis with other couples, except naked. Feelings are forbidden.
relationshipstructures
Everyone thinks ethical non-monogamy is about wanting more sex with more people. It's not. It's about wanting different—different needs met, different structures possible, different ways of being honest. The people who try ENM for more sex usually fail. The people who try it for more
relationshipstructures
Relationship anarchy is not polyamory with extra steps. It's not an excuse to avoid commitment. It's not "I do whatever I want and call it a philosophy." It's the radical premise that no relationship is inherently more important than any other—and
relationshipstructures
When marriage was illegal for you, you had to invent something else. Straight people got scripts. The relationship escalator: dating, exclusive, engaged, married, kids, death. Every step mapped. Every milestone celebrated. Society provided the template and the infrastructure to support it. Queer people got nothing—or worse, active hostility. No
relationshipstructures
Can you share bodies and keep hearts? The swingers of the 1950s bet yes. They were half right. The emotional firewall they tried to build was leaky from the start. But their experiment proved something: consensual non-monogamy was possible. Later generations would figure out for whom. The Myth and the
relationshipstructures
Before "ethical non-monogamy" had a name, before apps and terminology and Reddit threads, people were already hacking the system. The lavender marriage was the first widely practiced consensual alternative to traditional monogamy—and nobody called it that because calling it anything would have gotten you killed. What It