What Is Omnisexual?

Part 7 of 36 in the The 2026 Kink Field Guide series.

Omnisexual means being attracted to all genders, with gender being a factor in that attraction.

This sounds like pansexual but isn't quite. The distinction is subtle: pansexual means attraction regardless of gender—gender isn't part of the equation. Omnisexual means attraction to all genders—gender is part of the equation, but no gender is excluded.

The omni person might be attracted to men, women, nonbinary people, genderfluid people, agender people. All genders can be attractive. But gender influences how the attraction manifests. The attraction to a man might feel different than the attraction to a woman, even though both are possible.

This is the nuance. Not gender-blind, but gender-inclusive.

The Pan/Omni Distinction

Let's make this concrete.

Pansexual framing: "I'm attracted to people, not genders. Someone's gender doesn't factor into whether I find them attractive. It's about the individual."

Omnisexual framing: "I'm attracted to all genders, but the attraction isn't identical across genders. I might be more drawn to masculine energy at some times, feminine energy at others. Gender is a variable—I just don't exclude any value of that variable."

The pansexual says gender is irrelevant. The omnisexual says gender is relevant but non-limiting.

Both are multi-gender attracted. Both can be attracted to people of any gender. The difference is whether gender matters to the attraction.

Some examples:

An omnisexual person might have different "types" for different genders. Attracted to masc men with one set of qualities, femme women with another set, androgynous nonbinary people with a third set. The attraction pattern varies by gender.

An omnisexual person might notice they're more attracted to one gender at different life phases or moods. Cyclical attraction patterns where gender influences desire's current shape.

An omnisexual person might experience the attraction differently—the felt sense of attraction to a man being distinct from the felt sense of attraction to a woman, even though both exist.

Why the Label Exists

If you can be attracted to all genders, why does it matter whether gender is a factor?

For some people, pansexual doesn't quite fit.

"I'm not gender-blind. I notice gender. I find different things attractive about different genders. But I can be attracted to anyone. Pan felt too much like I was erasing the gender-related aspects of my attraction."

"Bisexual felt limited—like it assumed two genders, or like it grouped all multi-gender attraction together without nuance. Omnisexual captured that I'm attracted to all genders with awareness of gender."

"I have preferences that vary by gender. Pan implies no preferences related to gender. That's not me. Omni is more accurate."

The label provides precision for people whose multi-gender attraction isn't gender-blind but also isn't limited to certain genders.

The Criticism

Omnisexual faces criticism similar to other newer sexuality terms.

"It's just bi with extra steps." Bisexuality has evolved to include "attraction to two or more genders" or "attraction to genders like mine and different from mine." Modern bisexuality encompasses most of what omnisexuality describes. Why add a new word?

"It's just pan with a caveat." If both mean attraction to all genders, the pan/omni distinction might seem like splitting hairs. Does it matter whether gender is a factor if the outcome (all genders can be attractive) is the same?

"Labels are getting ridiculous." The proliferation of sexuality terms frustrates people who see it as unnecessary fragmentation. Every micro-distinction becomes its own identity, making communication harder rather than easier.

The Defense

People who use omnisexual typically emphasize experiential accuracy.

Language shapes experience. Having exact words for experiences helps people understand themselves and communicate with others. The pan/omni distinction, while subtle, might capture something real about how attraction works for different people.

Bisexual carries baggage. Whether or not modern bisexuality is inclusive of all genders, the word has history. Some people want a term that's more explicitly about all genders from the start.

Pansexual implies gender-blindness. For people whose attraction is actively gender-aware, pansexual can feel inaccurate. Omnisexual describes gender-aware attraction without implying limits.

The value of the label depends on whether the distinction it captures is meaningful. For some, it is. For others, existing terms work fine.

Patterns of Attraction

Omnisexual attraction can manifest in various patterns:

Shifting preferences. Attraction might lean toward different genders at different times. More drawn to men this month, more drawn to women next month—but never entirely unattracted to any gender.

Different attraction types by gender. Aesthetic attraction might be strongest to one gender, sexual attraction to another, romantic attraction to a third. The attraction systems don't align the same way across genders.

Gender-specific "types." What you find attractive varies by gender. Your type in men differs from your type in women differs from your type in nonbinary people. All genders can be attractive, but not in the same way.

Equal but distinct. Some omnisexual people experience roughly equal attraction across genders, but the felt sense of that attraction differs. The attraction to different genders has different "flavors."

These patterns distinguish omnisexual from pansexual experience. A pansexual person, by definition, wouldn't experience these gender-correlated variations—or would describe them differently.

The Flag

The omnisexual flag has pink, black, and blue stripes—similar to the bi flag but with a different color progression. Pink representing attraction to femininity, blue representing attraction to masculinity, black representing attraction to all genders.

The flag provides visibility and community recognition. It's a way of signaling "this specific identity" rather than the broader bi or pan categories.

Comparison Chart

The chart simplifies, but it shows where omnisexual fits in the multi-gender attraction landscape.

The Lived Experience

What does being omnisexual look like in daily life?

Attraction variety. An omnisexual person might walk down the street and notice attractive people of multiple genders, experiencing each attraction differently. The man in the coffee shop registers as attractive in one way; the woman on the subway registers as attractive in another way. The nonbinary person at the bookstore registers differently still. Gender influences the texture of attraction.

Dating history diversity. Looking back, an omnisexual person's relationship history often includes multiple genders. Not necessarily in equal proportion—life circumstances and availability matter—but the capacity for attraction across genders shows up in practice.

Explaining to partners. When dating someone new, omnisexual people sometimes need to explain how their attraction works. "I'm attracted to you specifically, and gender is part of what I'm attracted to. But I could also be attracted to people of other genders, just differently." This can reassure partners who worry that omni means "always looking elsewhere."

Preference fluctuation. Some omnisexual people notice their preferences shift over time. More drawn to masculine people in one life phase, more drawn to feminine people in another. The orientation remains—attraction to all genders—but the emphasis changes.

Community belonging. Omnisexual people often participate in broader bisexual or pansexual communities since the distinctions are subtle. The label matters personally but doesn't necessarily create separate social worlds.

The Attachment Angle

Does omnisexuality correlate with attachment patterns?

Not directly. Omnisexual people can have any attachment style. The orientation describes who you're attracted to and how gender factors in—not how you relate to closeness and intimacy.

But there might be indirect connections:

Secure attachment might correlate with comfort in a complex identity. Securely attached people can hold nuanced self-understanding without anxiety. An omnisexual person secure in their identity doesn't need the label validated by others.

Anxious attachment might create extra need for label validation. If you're anxiously attached, having the "right" label might feel important for identity security. The precision of omnisexual might appeal to someone who needs clear categorization.

Avoidant attachment might correlate with rejecting labels entirely. Avoidantly attached people sometimes resist being pinned down—preferring not to label their sexuality at all, or using broader terms that don't invite interrogation.

Practical Use

In dating contexts, omnisexual signals:

Explicit all-gender inclusion. Unlike bi (which some people read as "two genders only," rightly or wrongly), omnisexual explicitly includes all genders. Nonbinary and genderfluid people can feel confident they're not excluded.

Gender-aware attraction. Unlike pan (which implies gender-blindness), omnisexual signals that gender is part of the attraction landscape. Someone whose gender expression is important to them might appreciate a partner who notices and appreciates that expression.

Community membership. Using the specific term signals familiarity with the discourse, membership in communities that care about these distinctions.

Whether to use omnisexual, bi, pan, or something else depends on which label feels most accurate and which signals you want to send.

The Bottom Line

Omnisexual describes a specific experience: attraction to all genders, with gender being a factor in how that attraction manifests.

For some people, this captures their experience better than pansexual (which implies gender-blindness) or bisexual (which some read as two-gender). For others, the distinction doesn't matter much.

The label exists because language is a tool for self-understanding and communication. When existing tools don't fit, people make new ones. Omnisexual is a tool some people find useful.

Whether the distinction between pan and omni is meaningful depends on the individual. Some multi-gender attracted people experience gender as irrelevant to their attraction. Others experience gender as relevant. The labels let those different experiences have different names.

That's what language does at its best: provide words for experiences that would otherwise be harder to see and share.

Previous: What Is Aroace? Next: The Male Submission Renaissance

Return to series overview