AI adoption isn’t a buffet. It’s a front door. Features don’t survive. Doors do.1

The AI Buffet Is a Scam (2025 Edition)

Every week a new app promises to “reinvent your AI workflow.” You sign up, duct-tape it into your day, and three weeks later it’s acquired, pivoted, or quietly sunset. I’ve lived this churn: Langflow experiments, DataStax offshoots, agent wrappers that productized what I wrote at midnight and then vanished by quarter’s end.2 That’s not adoption; that’s gambling. And gambling doesn’t compound.3

The contrarian move is not to sample endlessly. It’s to pick the front door—the entry point where work starts and leverage accumulates.1

The Front Door Principle: How Tech Waves Collapse to One Door

Early in every wave, there’s an illusion of choice—lots of logos, lots of press, lots of “maybe.” Then the math tilts, and one door becomes the monolith.4 It happened in search, in social, in mobile, in video, in maps, in email, in file sync. It will happen (and is happening) in AI.

Search → Google’s Monolith

Pick your early-2000s poison—Yahoo, AltaVista, Ask Jeeves, Lycos. Looked competitive. But PageRank’s signal-to-noise advantage meant once adoption hit slope, it wasn’t a fair fight.5 Within a few years, “search” effectively meant Google.6

Social → Facebook’s Network Gravity

Friendster had heat, Orkut had countries, MySpace had culture. Facebook had compounding network effects. By the time the public realized it, the game was over.7

Mobile → iPhone + App Store S-curve

BlackBerry looked permanent, Palm had loyalists, Symbian was entrenched. Then iOS + App Store rewired developer incentives and distribution. Hedging across platforms felt prudent; betting iOS was how you compounded.8

Video → YouTube’s Distribution Flywheel

Vimeo was prettier, Dailymotion had traction. But YouTube’s creator + recommendation loop bent time. The growth curve chose the winner.9

When “Apps” Become “Features”

Some categories don’t keep stand-alone sovereignty; they get absorbed into the doors: Hotmail into OS/platform email,10 MapQuest into bundled maps,11 Dropbox into OS/cloud storage,12 Zoom into enterprise suites.13 Features don’t survive. Doors do.1

The Adoption Inevitability Curve (Google, Facebook, iPhone, YouTube)

There’s always a period that looks competitive. Then the slope tips. After that, there aren’t “choices”—there’s inevitability.14 Google, Facebook, iPhone, YouTube: from the outside, it looked “up for grabs.” Inside the numbers, it was already decided.15

That’s where AI is now. People pretend it’s still wide open—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, wrapper of the week—but the curve says otherwise. OpenAI’s slope is pulling away. Barring a black swan, the front door is already chosen: ChatGPT. Game over.16

The Leverage Lens: Operators vs. Tourists

Tech media gets paid to sample shiny things. That’s their job. They’re professional grazers.17 You’re not. You’re an entrepreneur, an executive, a creator. You don’t get paid to “try tools”; you get paid to build leverage.

Leverage isn’t born from sampling; it’s born from compounding—running the same front door long enough that your habits, data, and people stack on themselves.18

Think in Sandboxes, Not Headlines

For operators, AI value lives in the “boring” that eats time and payroll: compliance manuals, HR onboarding, SOPs, client FAQs, proposal templates, marketing copy, hashtags, captions, newsletter skeletons.19 The play is to build one sandbox (your front door) and let all of this run inside it.

The Executive Edge

  • Anchor on one door (ChatGPT).20
  • Load your sandbox (compliance docs, HR manuals, process sheets).21
  • Standardize content ops (hashtags, captions, briefs, summaries).22

Tourists collect experiences. Operators compound systems.23

Exploration, Yes — But Time-Box It

Try the field if you must. Some designers always preferred Mac; some writers may prefer Claude. But exploration should be time-bounded with a decision horizon. Curiosity is cheap; indecision is expensive.24

Projects in ChatGPT: The Door Inside the Door

If ChatGPT is the front door, Projects are the room where you set up shop. Two primitives do the heavy lifting:

  • Instructions — durable background about you/your org (who you are, goals, constraints, preferences).25
  • Files — the living knowledge base (docs, logs, manuals, datasets).26

Every chat inside the Project inherits both automatically. That’s how you stop repeating yourself and start compounding context.27

Use Case 1: Build a Personalized Health Plan

  1. Put your profile in Instructions: age, height, weight; training split; PRs; goals; constraints.28
  2. Upload Files: doctor notes, labwork, workout logs, supplement list.29
  3. Open a new chat: ask “Build me a 6-week strength plan.” GPT pulls context and delivers a plan specific to you.30

Use Case 2: Run a Creator Stack

  1. Put your handles in Instructions: TikTok, IG, YouTube, X, plus bio and style rules.31
  2. Upload Files: editorial calendar, brand guide, past content you like.32
  3. Open a new chat: ask “Give me hashtags for this script.” GPT outputs platform-calibrated sets.33

From Toy to Operator

A year ago, power users were duct-taping agents just to get half this. Now it’s native. Fill Instructions. Upload Files. Chat.34

This is the play:

  • The world will keep scattering.35
  • The blogs will keep hyping shiny tools.36
  • The tourists will keep beta-testing for free.37

But the operators — the ones who pick the front door, build their sandbox, and let Projects run — they’re the ones who will actually compound.38

References
1Front Door PrincipleThe idea that each tech wave consolidates around one dominant entry point; compounding leverage requires picking it early.source
2Langflow, DataStaxExamples of experimental AI tooling acquired or abandoned quickly.source
3Compounding vs. GamblingGambling scatters energy; compounding leverages one system repeatedly.source
4Monolith PatternEach wave consolidates into a single dominant platform (Google, Facebook, iOS, YouTube).source
5Yahoo/AltaVista/Ask Jeeves/LycosEarly search competitors supplanted by Google’s PageRank model.source
6Google PageRankSuperior search algorithm made Google inevitable.source
7Friendster, Orkut, MySpaceSocial platforms that lost to Facebook’s network effects.source
8BlackBerry, Palm, SymbianMobile platforms disrupted by iPhone + App Store growth.source
9Vimeo, DailymotionVideo competitors outpaced by YouTube’s adoption curve.source
10HotmailEarly webmail service absorbed into larger OS ecosystems.source
11MapQuestStandalone mapping replaced by bundled Google Maps, Apple Maps.source
12DropboxFile storage folded into Google Drive, iCloud, OneDrive.source
13ZoomStandalone video app absorbed into enterprise collaboration suites.source
14Adoption Inevitability CurveThe phase when the growth slope makes one winner inevitable.source
15Google/Facebook/iPhone/YouTubeExamples of inevitability curves in tech adoption.source
16OpenAI’s GrowthChatGPT adoption slope outpacing other AI players.source
17Tech Media GrazingCoverage bias toward novelty for clicks and ad revenue.source
18Compounding HabitsRepetition across one platform builds efficiency.source
19Operational Boring WorkWhere AI adds value: compliance docs, HR, FAQs, marketing churn.source
20Anchor on One DoorStrategic focus: pick a single platform (ChatGPT) for leverage.source
21Sandbox LoadingFeeding ChatGPT Projects with docs/manuals.source
22Standardized Content OpsUsing AI for hashtags, briefs, notes, templates.source
23Tourists vs OperatorsTourists sample tools; operators build compounding systems.source
24Exploration vs AnchoringExploration is good if time-bounded; leverage requires commitment.source
25Instructions FieldDurable background context in ChatGPT Projects.source
26Files TabUploaded docs in ChatGPT Projects for memory/context.source
27Context CompoundingEach Project chat inherits instructions and files automatically.source
28Health Plan InputsProfile data (age, weight, PRs, goals) stored in Instructions.source
29Health Plan FilesSupporting files like workout logs, medical docs.source
30Health Plan QueryPrompt inside Project generates tailored plan with context.source
31Creator InstructionsHandles, bios, style rules added to Instructions.source
32Creator FilesEditorial guides, brand docs uploaded to Files.source
33Creator QueryHashtag generation prompt outputs platform-calibrated sets.source
34Agent Duct-Taping

You May Be Interested