Part 5 of 9 in the Toxic Masculinity in 2026: A Field Guide series.

We haven't heard much from them lately.

In 2018, incels were front-page news. Forums analyzed, manifestos dissected, the phenomenon treated as imminent threat. MGTOW—Men Going Their Own Way—had YouTube channels with millions of views explaining why men should abandon relationships with women entirely.

Now it's quiet. The forums still exist, but the cultural moment passed. The moral panic moved on to other things.

So... where'd they go?

This isn't rhetorical. I'm genuinely checking. Did they get jobs? Girlfriends? Did they age out of the ideology? Radicalize quieter? Move into different containers?

Let's look.

The Incel Update

The incel community—involuntary celibates, men who can't attract romantic partners despite wanting to—hasn't disappeared. It's just become less visible.

Some aged out. The early forums were heavily young men in their late teens and early twenties. People in that cohort often figure things out. They develop social skills. They find partners. They look back on their forum years with embarrassment.

This is the most common outcome. The 22-year-old posting blackpill content becomes the 28-year-old with a girlfriend and a job who doesn't think about any of this anymore. Inceldom, for many, was a phase—a painful phase, but one they grew past. The brain develops. Social skills accumulate. Sometimes people just get lucky—meet someone who likes them despite their awkwardness, and the relationship becomes the corrective experience they needed.

The aging-out pathway is real and probably represents the majority. But we don't hear from them because they're not posting. They're not identifying as "former incels." They're just living normal lives, occasionally wincing when they remember the stuff they used to post.

Some found community elsewhere. The loneliness that drove men to incel spaces was real, even if the ideology was toxic. The need for belonging, for understanding, for spaces where you could talk about rejection without being told to just be confident—that need was genuine.

Some found that community in healthier containers—gaming groups, hobby communities, therapy, actual friendship. They discovered that the thing they needed wasn't access to women's bodies but connection with humans generally. The incel community was serving a need (belonging, mutual understanding) that could be met other ways.

This matters. It suggests that for some segment of incels, the ideology was secondary. The community was primary. They weren't committed to blackpill—they were lonely and found other lonely people. When they found community elsewhere, the ideology fell away. It was never load-bearing.

Some went darker. This is the uncomfortable truth. The men who didn't age out, who didn't find community, who marinated in the ideology for years—some radicalized further. Not all of them post about it. The quiet ones are harder to track.

The manifestos that emerge after violence often reveal years of silent absorption. The ideology internalized. The resentment pressure-cooked. These men didn't stop being incels—they stopped posting. They went from loud processing to quiet stewing. The ideology didn't weaken; it condensed.

Some moved to new containers. The red-pill-to-trad pipeline is real. Men who spent their twenties in incel spaces sometimes emerge in their thirties as trad advocates. The same resentment, different costume.

This is fascinating from a dynamics perspective. The incel ideology—women are hypergamous, modern dating is broken, men are getting a raw deal—doesn't disappear. It finds a different outlet. The trad framework offers a solution narrative: traditional gender roles fix the problems modernity created. Be the provider, find a traditional woman, build the family structure that actually works.

The underlying resentment remains. But instead of externalizing as "women won't date me," it externalizes as "modern women have been corrupted by feminism, but I found a good one." The rage redirects. From "the system is rigged against me" to "I figured out how to work the system." The analysis of gender dynamics stays basically the same; the self-positioning changes from victim to winner.

The MGTOW Update

MGTOW—Men Going Their Own Way—was always different from incel. Incels wanted relationships and couldn't get them. MGTOW claimed to reject relationships by choice.

The movement had phases:

MGTOW 1: Genuinely going your own way. Men who'd been through divorces, bad relationships, family court disasters. They weren't angry at all women—just done participating in institutions that had hurt them. This was the original vision.

MGTOW 2: The content machine. YouTube channels. Forums. An endless discourse about why women were the problem. Men who claimed to be "going their own way" but spent all their time talking about women. The philosophy curdled into grievance.

MGTOW 2026: The brand is less visible. The YouTube channels got demonetized or drifted to other topics. The forums consolidated or died.

But the underlying sentiment didn't disappear. It just merged with other streams. Trad content. Passport bros. The general male dissatisfaction that keeps finding new containers.

The Red-Pill-to-Trad Pipeline

Here's a pattern I've noticed:

Man enters red-pill spaces in his twenties. Learns the terminology: hypergamy, alpha widow, the wall. Becomes cynical about women and relationships.

Man ages into his thirties. The cynicism isn't sustainable. He wants connection, family, meaning. Pure rejection isn't a life philosophy.

Man discovers trad content. Traditional relationships. Traditional gender roles. A framework that promises the connection he wants without abandoning the gender analysis he absorbed.

The red-piller becomes the trad husband. Same underlying beliefs about gender, different packaging. The woman goes from "hypergamous threat" to "correctly feminine wife." The man goes from "red-pilled bachelor" to "traditional patriarch."

The rage gets redirected. Instead of hating the game, he believes he's found the cheat code. A woman who's different. A relationship that works because it's structured correctly.

Sometimes it works. Traditional relationships aren't inherently dysfunctional. Some people genuinely thrive in clearly defined roles.

Sometimes it doesn't. The old resentment leaks through. The woman who was supposed to be "different" reveals herself as an actual person with complexity, and the framework can't hold her.

The Quiet Ones

The incels who worried me most were never the loud ones.

The loud ones were processing something—messily, toxically, but processing. They were in dialogue with an ideology, even a bad one. They could be reached, argued with, potentially redirected.

The quiet ones scared me. Men who absorbed the ideology, stopped posting, went dark. What happens to that resentment when it goes underground?

Some of them are fine. They got jobs, moved on, cringed at their old posts. Normal trajectory.

Some of them aren't. The manifestos that emerge after violence often reveal years of silent stewing. The ideology internalized and pressure-cooked.

We can't track the quiet ones. That's what makes them worrying.

The Weight Room vs. The Manifesto

There's a fork in the road that matters:

Some men take their frustration to the gym. They lift. They improve. They channel the energy into physical transformation. This often helps. Building competence in one domain tends to spread. The man who gets fit often becomes more socially confident, not because muscles attract women (they sometimes do, sometimes don't) but because accomplishing hard things changes self-perception.

This is the action pathway. The frustration becomes fuel for self-improvement. The resentment gets metabolized through effort. You can't think your way to a 300-pound deadlift—you have to do the work, show up consistently, tolerate discomfort, build capacity over time.

That process changes people. Not always in the ways they expect. They might enter the gym thinking "I'll get jacked and then women will want me." That's the conscious motivation. But what actually happens is they build self-efficacy. They learn that sustained effort produces results. They get comfortable in their body. They find community in the gym. They feel competent.

Sometimes that competence translates to dating success. Sometimes it doesn't. But either way, the person who emerges from two years of consistent training is different from the person who entered. More capable. More grounded. Less trapped in their head.

Some men take their frustration to forums. They analyze. They theorize. They build elaborate frameworks explaining their failure. This usually doesn't help. The analysis becomes self-reinforcing. The framework prevents the work.

This is the rumination pathway. The frustration becomes material for endless processing. Every rejection gets analyzed through the framework. Every success (by other men) gets explained through the framework. The framework becomes totalizing—it explains everything, which means it's unfalsifiable, which means it can't be updated by evidence.

The man in the forum explains why his canthal tilt dooms him. Why hypergamy makes dating impossible. Why looks determine everything. The explanation feels good—it's not his fault, it's biology, it's systems, it's structural. But the explanation also makes action pointless. If canthal tilt determines outcomes and you can't change canthal tilt, why try?

The weight room tends to produce men who age out of the ideology. The forum tends to produce men who dig deeper.

It's not a perfect correlation. Plenty of gymcels never escape—they lift obsessively, get impressive physiques, still can't attract partners, conclude that their face is the limiting factor and all the gym work was cope. Plenty of forum lurkers eventually leave—they read for a while, decide it's too depressing, log off and just live their lives.

But the tendency is clear: action helps, analysis often doesn't. Or more precisely: action creates the possibility of surprise. The man lifting might discover that competence in one domain spreads. The man building frameworks has removed the possibility of surprise—everything gets assimilated into the framework.

This fork matters enormously. The same lonely, frustrated 21-year-old can take either path. One path often leads out. The other often leads deeper. And we don't know how to reliably direct people toward one path over the other.

Where Are They Now?

The ones who made it out: Working jobs, in relationships, embarrassed by their forum history. They're not identifying as "former incels"—they're just living lives. You'd never know unless they told you.

The ones who aged into new containers: Trad content. Passport bros. Various flavors of male-focused self-improvement that maintain the gender analysis without the explicit rage. Still online, different aesthetics.

The ones who went dark: We don't know. That's the honest answer. Some are fine. Some aren't. The ones who aren't reveal themselves eventually, usually badly.

The ones still in it: The forums still exist. Smaller, less visible, but active. Men are still joining. The phenomenon didn't end—it just aged out of cultural visibility.

The Welfare Check

So: are they okay?

Some are. The majority, probably. The guy who posted blackpill content at 22 is often a normal 30-year-old who doesn't think about any of this anymore.

Some aren't. The long-term residents. The men for whom the ideology became identity. The ones who never found the exit.

And some are in limbo. Still lonely, still struggling, not radicalized but not okay either. The quiet desperation that doesn't make news.

The honest answer is we don't know. The cultural panic moved on. The academic interest waned. The forums got quieter but didn't disappear.

We stopped watching. That doesn't mean the phenomenon ended.

Previous: Sigma Male Is Just Batman Without the Bat Next: What Is a Trad Husband?

Return to series overview